
Legal
Letter from AmSpa Founder on Texas Med Spa Bill Restricting NPs and PAs
On March 4, 2025 HB 3749 was introduced in the Texas House of Representatives seeking to significantly restrict NPs and ...
Posted By Madilyn Moeller, Thursday, April 3, 2025
On March 4, 2025 HB 3749 was introduced in the Texas House of Representatives seeking to significantly restrict NPs and PAs working in medical spas in the state. The following is the full text of a letter from AmSpa founder and CEO Alex Thiersch, JD, to the bill’s chief sponsor, Representative Angelia Orr. For more information on this and other bills currently active in the Texas statehouse that would affect medical aesthetics, see our Texas Med Spa Legislation Action Center.
Representative Angelia Orr
Room E1.220
P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768
Re: HB 3749
Dear Representative Orr,
On behalf of the American Med Spa Association (AmSpa), I would like to submit the following in relation to HB 3749. We applaud the efforts to address unlicensed and unsupervised medical spas and IV clinics, an increasingly troublesome issue that our industry is grappling with not only in Texas but across the country.
Ultimately, we can’t support the bill, not because we don’t support the desire to make the industry safer, but because we don’t believe the bill achieves that purpose. This bill, while undoubtedly well-intentioned, makes medical spas less safe by removing qualified oversight that every other health care clinic maintains, while not addressing the actual problems this industry faces. I look forward to discussing this further.
Three points need to be made here:
The American Med Spa Association (AmSpa) is the largest trade group in the medical spa industry. Consisting of over 4,000 members, including close to 1,000 in Texas, AmSpa is dedicated to ensuring the non-invasive aesthetic industry is safe and that its practitioners are trained, qualified, and compliant. AmSpa’s goal since its founding in 2013 is to ensure the aesthetic industry understands and complies with the myriad health care regulations put in place to ensure the public is protected. It is in our best interests to rid the industry of unqualified practitioners and unsupervised medical spas.
Partnered with ByrdAdatto, the leading aesthetic health care law firm in the United States (headquartered in Dallas), as well as some of the top clinical providers in the industry, AmSpa has developed a database and corresponding legal analysis of the medical spa laws in all 50 states. We have also created comprehensive practice guidelines that will not only address the circumstances contemplated in the current bill, but also ensure that all Texas med spas commit to and comply with minimum standards and requirements widely accepted as safe.
Medical spas are considered medical practices, and therefore the medical laws and regulations of each state govern medical spas in that state. In Texas, while medical spas’ minimum requirements are the same as any medical office, the Texas Medical Board has adopted additional regulation governing delegation and supervision of nonsurgical medical cosmetic procedures (22 TX Admin Code § 169, “Rule 169”). Medical spas are already more heavily regulated than other medical practices.
Most med spas adhere to the strict medical framework of a traditional medical practice, which make compliant med spas very safe. Reports of complications and side effects are rare, despite an explosion in treatments in recent years. Evidence of this exists in the cost of professional insurance policies for medical spas, which remain far below national averages. The numbers of lawsuits and malpractice claims is also far lower than other areas of medicine.
While medical spas are designed to have a more patient-centered experience (i.e. not as clinical and sterile as a typical doctor’s office), the patient treatment process is the same:
It must be noted that these regulations, had they been followed, would almost certainly have prevented the Jenifer Cleveland tragedy from happening. The clinic at issue should have had a physician or properly licensed NP or PA providing an initial exam before treatment, there should have been written protocols in place and a physician available for immediate consultation in the event of a complication, and there should have been a trained providers on site to deal with complications. In short, had the current laws been followed and enforced, we wouldn’t be having this debate right now.
We encourage the Committee to review Rule 169, and we would be happy to provide specific legal guidance from health care regulatory counsel as to its applicability to med spas.
We do not wish to sweep what happened to Jenifer Cleveland under the rug, nor do we want to ignore any issues that exist in medical spas in Texas. Our primary goal is the same as yours: to ensure that medical spas are safe and that patients are protected. But we also know that the vast majority of med spas are safe, and they operate in accordance with strict medical regulations that are already in place. By abruptly changing those regulations, the current bill would make the good med spas less safe by taking away medical oversight they have employed for years, and that every other medical practice area currently employs, while not addressing the real problem we’re dealing with as an industry – the operation of illegal, unlicensed med spas.
For example:
There are bad actors and bad situations in this industry that must be addressed, and we know exactly where they originate. The problems are caused by unlicensed, noncompliant, untrained providers doing treatments they shouldn’t be doing. In other words, unlawful practices blatantly operating contrary to well-established law and medical regulation.
The bad actors in our industry are violating existing laws – laws that, if enforced, would prevent the very problems we all want to solve. The current bill will punish ethical providers and hardworking professionals, punishing all med spas for problems caused by those already breaking the law. HB 3749 doesn’t make the industry any safer. It just shuts down the safe med spas and creates more unsafe, uncompliant ones in its place.
What happened to Jenifer Cleveland was unconscionable. It was also illegal. While, as mentioned before, many elements in HB3749 are not objectionable and are, in fact, already the law, the provisions cited above will do little to advance patient safety. Rather they will cause almost all med spas in Texas to shut down and put thousands out of work.
AmSpa welcomes the opportunity to work with all stakeholders on this issue. We have been researching, training, and educating the industry for over ten years, and we have access to advisors and professionals that have been in the space for over 20 years. AmSpa supports well-informed, practical regulations that ensure patient safety while avoiding reactive legislation that overreaches or harms an already safe industry, and we are committed to rejecting any so-called "medical spas" that fail to follow the laws and regulations of medical practice or engage in unsafe and/or unethical practices.
Related Tags
Medical spa news, blogs and updates sent directly to your inbox.
Legal
On March 4, 2025 HB 3749 was introduced in the Texas House of Representatives seeking to significantly restrict NPs and ...
Legal
The first quarter of 2025 has seen a significant wave of legislative activity that could have profound impacts on the ...
Legal
By Michael Byrd, JD, ByrdAdattoIn the health care industry, there are many legal arrangements that help practices operate smoothly and ...
Legal
Proposed Texas legislation would destroy the medical aesthetics industry as we know it, and not for the safety reason it ...